|
PART
3.1.1 Access
Context
 |
| Access
steps Ocean Grove |
I. Walton
|
Many parts
of the coast are very accessible with high quality facilities. Other
areas can only support minimal or no access to maintain ecological
integrity. Some areas may require seasonal closure to enable protection
of threatened species. There are some access points which are inappropriate
because they may not be maintained adequately; the level of allowable
access may not match the capacity of that particular coastal environment;
they may create further environmental or cultural site degradation;
or they may be unsafe. The demand for access and a diverse range
of recreational opportunities in coastal areas needs to be strategically
managed.
A key challenge
for land managers is to provide appropriate access in a way that
is safe, can be maintained in the long-term, and protects the ecological
integrity and biodiversity of the surrounding environment. The limited
amount of space and the diverse range of recreational activities
that occur on the coast can also be a challenge for land managers,
particularly when uses compete with one another.
The range of
potential risks on the coast is another significant challenge for
land managers. Beach users, boat goers, sightseers, coastal managers
and community groups and volunteers are all exposed to a range of
risks on the coast. Ageing infrastructure, weather and beach conditions,
natural processes such as erosion and geology such as unstable cliffs
present risks to users. Under climate change scenarios, the frequency
and scale of these risks will increase, impacting on infrastructure
and the safety of beach users.
Managing these risks to prevent and reduce emergency events is challenging,
particularly when combined with increased visitation.
A range of
opportunities to experience the coast will continue to be offered
to the community, including the young, aged and the physically disadvantaged.
However, it is neither possible, nor desirable, to provide a uniformly
high level of access to all parts of the coast, and therefore access
and service levels must be determined in a strategic way.
| Policy |
| 1. |
Strategically
plan for and deliver sustainable and equitable recreation
opportunities on the coast that respond to an identified demand.
|
| 2. |
Manage
demand for coastal recreation, including Crown land access,
to protect natural and cultural values and optimise visitor
experiences. |
| 3. |
Apply
standards and agreed levels of service for a range of recreational
uses across coastal, estuarine and marine environments. |
| 4. |
Support
the use of the coast by community-based clubs, such as lifesaving,
angling, yachting and sailing clubs that provide safe and supervised
water activities and manage access to and use of the coastal
environment. |
| 5. |
Ensure
public safety considerations are addressed where public access
to the coast is provided, readily available or encouraged. |
| 6. |
Prohibit
unauthorised off-road access to coastal Crown land by private
vehicles. |
| 7. |
Plan
to have direct nodal access roads to coastal areas, and where
possible and practical avoid running roads parallel to the coast. |
| 8. |
Redesign,
remove or relocate poorly used or poorly sited roads or car
parks for environmental, aesthetic and safety reasons. |
Actions
a
Facilitate regional approaches to improve and rationalise access
to and on the coast through the application of a coastal access
decision-making tool (RCB, DSE, CoM,
PV, LG).
b
Establish priority areas for all mobility access needs (RCB,
CoM, PV, DSE).
c
Develop a level of service framework for the coast to facilitate
the delivery of a consistent quality of service to coastal visitors,
and to identify strategic priorities for investment in the type,
scale and quality of services that coastal planners and managers
should deliver (VCC, DSE, CoM, PV).
d
Implement programs to assist coastal planners and managers address
risk from aging infrastructure, aquatic safety, access and emergency
events (DSE, MSV, LSV, ESTA).
|